2000 Ford F-250 Suspension Problems

21 owners have reported suspension problems with the 2000 Ford F-250 to NHTSA — 6% of all 326 complaints for this model year. The typical failure happened around 9,000 miles. That ranks #14 of 20 F-250 model years for suspension complaints (a typical year has 28). No suspension recall has been issued for this model year.

21complaints
9ktypical miles
0related recalls
2crashes
0fires
0injuries

Which parts fail

  • Front
    6
  • Rear
    5
  • Front › Shock absorber
    2
  • Front › Control arm › Upper ball joint
    1
  • Front › Wheel bearing
    1

Components named in complaints (struts, shocks, control arms, ball joints, springs).

Mileage when the problem started

  • Under 25k
    267%
  • 25k–50k
    00%
  • 50k–75k
    00%
  • 75k–100k
    00%
  • 100k–150k
    00%
  • 150k+
    133%

Owner reports

Selected complaints filed with NHTSA by 2000 Ford F-250 owners, lightly cleaned up (personal details are redacted by NHTSA).

While driving 65-70 MPH and towing a trailer extreme vibration occurred which caused loss of vehicle control, resulting in truck and trailer turning over. The air bags did not deploy during the accident and the trailer was total loss.

Mar 2001 · crash

Rear suspension too weak to carry truck body causing over travel on springs when driving with 500lbs or more in truck bed. My truck can equiped with a service body tool box.the tires were beginning to rub to underside of truck. Ford decided to replace suspennision with a larger capicity. I was stuck with the installation cost of $600.00 tires: my left front tire developed a sidewall blister the size of a softball in June,2000. General tire replaced both front tires at no cost but again I paid Ford $25 install cost. Now a few days ago my left rear tire developed a sidewall blister the size of a softball. I've requested that general tire replace all tires with another manufacture but they have refused. They are willing to replace the defective tire but I don't trust there quality enough to ride my family on. …

Rear · Nov 1999

The OEM shock absorbers were defective causing the vehicle rebound 2-3 cycles after hitting a bump and caused the tires to develop moderate cupping, the position of the drivers side OEM shock absorber top bolt had a sharp edge and was rubbing a hole in the outer jacket of the hydraulic hose exposing the inner braid, consumer explored the possibility of repositioning the hose but a hose support clamp would not allow such positioning. Nlm

Front › Shock absorber · Dec 2000

While driving 30 MPH and higher, steering wheel jerks out of consumers hands, causing a loss of vehicle control, consumer states that there is a problem with the front suspension, if a rough surface is hit, steering will jerk out of drivers hands, vehicle will bounce around sideways out of control, dealer installed shimmy shock to attempt to correct problem, consumer states it helps, however has not completely remedied problem.

Front › Shock absorber · Aug 2001

When at a stop not able to turn wheels while brakes are applied. Ford company indicated that this was the way vehicle was designed. The design flaw is the cause for steering problem that occurs when brakes are applied. A new wider stance, tie rod angle and the fact that there is more weight in the front end than on the 97 older body style vehicle.

Nov 1999

Was driving and applied the brakes, pedal started to chatter. Stopping distance was diminished. Took to dealership and was informed that rotors were warped. Was not under warranty for repairs. Electrical crossed wires in alternator system were smoldering. It was repaired. Front end would make clunking noise while turning. Nothing was found.

Front · Jan 2000

Consumer states the vehicle constantly pulls to the left. Took to deaelr and dealer could not duplicated, after which consumer took vehcle back out on road. As a result consumer loss control of vehicle and landed in a ditch. Please provide any further information. Ts

Nov 2002

Ongoing problem with vehicle wandering across the road while driving at any speed; vehicle been in dealer shop on several occasions, and problem still reoccurring. Feel free to provide any further information concerning this matter.

Jun 2000

Consumer purchased a camper top. Suspension is too weak to support this camper, back end sinks down about 3 inches when camper is put on. Which in turn puts front end up. Consumer has a hard time looking over hood of vehicle.

May 2000

When turning left or right vehicle will shake. When pulling from a drop off or parking lot there was a loud humming noise. Then, it faded away. Driver also, when putting in gear, there was a clunck noise then a jerk.

Front · Jan 2001

Suspension complaints in other F-250 years

’95’96’97’98’99’00’01’02’03’04’05’06’07’08’09’10’11’12’13’142414301428211510623785233528291111254881
Suspension complaints per model year, Ford F-250.

Frequently asked questions

How common are suspension problems on the 2000 Ford F-250?

NHTSA has 21 complaints about the suspension of the 2000 Ford F-250, 6% of the model year's 326 complaints. The component named most often is front (6 mentions).

Is there a recall for 2000 Ford F-250 suspension problems?

No. NHTSA lists no suspension recall for the 2000 Ford F-250, though it has 5 recalls for other components. If the problem is widespread, a repair may still be covered by an extended warranty or a manufacturer service bulletin — ask a dealer.

At what mileage do 2000 Ford F-250 suspension problems start?

Half of the complaints with a recorded mileage happened before about 9,000 miles, and 67% before 25,000 miles.

Is it dangerous?

Owners linked 2 crashes, 0 fires and 0 injuries to suspension problems on this model year. If you notice symptoms, have the car checked before driving further.

Source: U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) — owner complaints through October 20, 2026, recalls and defect investigations; fuel economy from the EPA. Complaints are unverified reports and are not proof of a defect. How we rate model years.