Which parts fail
Components named in complaints (wheels, lug nuts, original-equipment tires, TPMS).
Mileage when the problem started
Owner reports
Selected complaints filed with NHTSA by 2005 Ford F-150 owners, lightly cleaned up (personal details are redacted by NHTSA).
Tl* the contact owns a 2005 Ford f-150 equipped with cooper discoverer h/t tires, size 245/65r17, dot number: up15c56. The contact was driving 55 MPH when the front passenger side tire experienced tread separation, causing it to shred to pieces. The contact merged to the shoulder where he changed the tire and installed the spare. The front fender of the vehicle was damaged as a result of the tire failure. The contact stated that there were no road hazards present that could have contributed to the failure. The vehicle was taken for routine maintenance prior to the failure and there were no failures found with the tires, which were inspected. The dealer was notified of the failure who filed a claim with the manufacturer on behalf of the contact. The manufacturer of the tire was notified who advised that they would contact him at a later date. The tire failure mileage was 8,000. …
Tl* the contact owns a 2005 Ford f15o sd turbo charged. The vehicle has master craft 35/12.50/ r17 courser ct tires, purchased as replacement tires. While driving at approximate speeds of 65 MPH, the tread on the front drivers side tire unraveled. The contact was able to maintain control of the vehicle by releasing his foot from the accelerator pedal. There was damage to the nerf bar, drivers side door and fender. The vehicle proceeded to crash into a road bump, causing damage to the passengers side mirror and fender. The vehicle was taken to a local repair shop where the nerf bar, door, fender and mirror were repaired. The tire was replaced at the expense of the manufacturer. The VIN was not available. The failure mileage was 90,000 and the current mileage was 91,000. Updated 05/19/10.
A wheel stud, Ford p/n yl3z 1107 ab, on the right front wheel/hub assembly would not tighten to the prescribed 150 ft-lbs torque because it stretched. The wheel stud stretched 0.044" before I stopped trying to torque it up to specification. The wheel stud and nut were replaced. The vehicle was stationary. There was no accident or incident involved. I believe that either Ford has overstated the tightening torque or there is a materials and/or heat treating defect. The wheel stud appears to be zinc plated. The wheel bolt torque of 150 ft-lbs is listed in reference materials as the tightening torque for plain, unlubricated m14 class 10.9 steel fasteners. The tightening torque for zinc plated m14 fasteners is about 20 ft-lb less.
Had what appeared to be a slow leak in rear tire. Took it to les schwab tire and they found it was a weld that was failing in the original stock rim. The split was approximately 8 inches long. I then spoke to a local Ford dealer who denied ever hearing any knowledge of such a thing and simply said you cannot believe everything you see on the internet after I had googled the issue. He said Ford takes these things very seriously but that this was something brand new. He kept insisting a 13 year old truck will have issues and that I should look at their new ones...even though the internet had all ages of rim issues related to the f series pickups
Tl* the contact owns a 2005 Ford f-150. While driving 40 MPH, the two front wheels on the vehicle seized without warning. The contact stated that the failure occurred on at least eight occasions. The dealer was not contacted. The manufacturer was made aware of the issue and provided case number: cas12702472. In addition, the contact cited NHTSA campaign number: 08V208000 (service brakes, hydraulic) as a possible cause of the failure. The failure mileage was 230,000.
Turning left into south bound lane of a highway when the right front upper control arm assembly caused the tire to detach from the that area. The tire landed on the highway however remained attached from the lower assembly. Due to the momentum of the vehicle was able to get across the highway to prevent a collision. Vehicle was towed to an automotive repair center. The right front upper control arm assembly was completely rusted through
Dt: contact stated while traveling at 35 MPH the tire came off the rim. He lost control of the vehicle, causing the vehicle to veer into on coming traffic, and colliding with four other vehicles. There was no warning prior to the accident. The vehicle was towed to a dealership. The vehicle was totaled. The manufacturer has not been contacted to determine what might have caused the problem. Injuries were reported.
Tl* the contact owns a 2005 Ford f-150 equipped with general ameri-trac tires, size: p255/70r17. The contact stated that all the tires exhibited cracks in between the tread pattern. The tires were not diagnosed or replaced. The tires were replacement tires. The manufacturer was not notified of the failure. The vehicle failure mileage was 116,000 and the tire failure mileage was 28,000.
I have a 2005 Ford f150 leased in July of 2005. I have experienced two incidences where a tire has gone flat in a matter of seconds while highway driving at speeds near 60 MPH. I was able to avoid an accident in each case but this could have gone terribly wrong if I was not able to control the vehicle to pull off to the side of the road as it was difficult to control or to keep in my lane. The second incident occurred on July 17, 2006. While driving at highway speed, near 65 MPH, my right rear tire went flat within 5 seconds. I had a difficult time trying to steer the truck and nearly collided with the vehicle next to me. I removed the wheel from the truck and took it to a local Ford dealer. The tire technician inspected the wheel and told me the valve stem was leaking; no hole or puncture in the tire could be found. …
My Ford f-150, 2005 model has a wheel bearing defect that causes bearing failure and brake wobble due to the weak bearings that's on 2004-2009 Ford f-150- 2wd trucks. The bearings can't be changed unless you purchase the entire installation (rotors, ABS hub bearing and one-time use nut.) Ford knows that the bearings are weak but will not authorize a repair unless you use original equipment. Ford put out a bulletin to use 4x4 parts on the 2wd vehicle. The 4x4 parts includes 3 pieces which included a more durable and harder bearing than what comes on the 2wd. There is only one place in texas that will due this repair (just brakes.) the repair is 300.00 per side but is a permanent fix for the weak bearings. Also each part can be change individually. Ford will sell you the parts but they will not make this repair to your vehicle. …
Wheel & Tire complaints in other F-150 years
Frequently asked questions
How common are wheel & tire problems on the 2005 Ford F-150?
NHTSA has 51 complaints about the wheels & tires of the 2005 Ford F-150, 5% of the model year's 1,112 complaints. The component named most often is tread/belt (4 mentions).
Is there a recall for 2005 Ford F-150 wheel & tire problems?
No. NHTSA lists no wheels & tires recall for the 2005 Ford F-150, though it has 3 recalls for other components. If the problem is widespread, a repair may still be covered by an extended warranty or a manufacturer service bulletin — ask a dealer.
At what mileage do 2005 Ford F-150 wheel & tire problems start?
Half of the complaints with a recorded mileage happened before about 45,000 miles, and 32% before 25,000 miles.
Is it dangerous?
Owners linked 3 crashes, 1 fire and 4 injuries to wheels & tires problems on this model year. If you notice symptoms, have the car checked before driving further.
Source: U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) — owner complaints through October 20, 2026, recalls and defect investigations; fuel economy from the EPA. Complaints are unverified reports and are not proof of a defect. How we rate model years.