1995 Dodge Ram 2500 Problems & Complaints

Averageabout as many complaints as a typical year of the Ram 2500 at the same age

Owners have filed 267 complaints about the 1995 Dodge Ram 2500 with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. That is about average for the Ram 2500 at the same age. The most reported problem area is the brakes (61 complaints, typically around 125,000 miles).

267complaints
0recalls
18crashes
13fires
8injuries
0deaths

Most common 1995 Dodge Ram 2500 problems

Share of the 267 complaints; one complaint can involve more than one system. "~" is the median mileage when the problem started.

Dodge Ram 2500 complaints by model year

’95’96’97’98’99’00’01’02’03’04’05’06’07’08’09’10’11’12267291213225313211469155661582422670361317214236298283
Owner complaints per model year, Dodge Ram 2500. Colour = our verdict for that year (red: avoid, orange: caution, green: better than average, blue: too new).

Best Ram 2500 years: 2002, 2000, 1998. Years to avoid: 2006, 2003, 2004. Compare all years →

NHTSA defect investigations

Federal safety investigators have looked into 6 possible defects involving the 1995 Dodge Ram 2500:

Front suspension spring/shock absorber

NHTSA investigation PE99026 · opened Apr 16, 1999 · closed Aug 31, 1999 · led to recall 99V-214

Allege failure of the coil spring/shock absorber bracket at its attachment to the vehicle frame May allow collapse of the front suspension, and potentially affect steering or braking system performance

Headlight circuit failure

NHTSA investigation PE98002 · opened Jan 14, 1998 · closed May 8, 1998

There is no summary currently available

Loss of throttle control

NHTSA investigation PE00048 · opened Dec 11, 2000 · closed Mar 7, 2001 · led to recall 01V-037

Alleged that the throttle cable can fray or sever during normal use resulting in the throttle not returning to idle or an inability to accelerate.

Headlight circuit

NHTSA investigation EA98010 · opened May 8, 1998 · closed Dec 10, 1999 · led to recall 99V-024

The headlamp switch in the subject vehicles can over-heat and fail resulting in loss of head lamps and possibly other lights.daimlerchrysler conducted a series of tests and determined that the 3500 series is prone to generating head lamp switch temperatures in excess of the switch lubricant threshold of 100 degrees centigrade.when this occurs, the lubricant solidifies and adheres to the switch contach surfaces…

Seat back failure

NHTSA investigation DP03006 · opened Sep 23, 2003 · closed Apr 8, 2004

Odi has identified 30 incidents where it is alleged the seat back collapsed in a rear impact crash.these incidents are alleged to have contributed to 23 injuries and two deaths.the data presented to odi show that the seat back strength of the front seats comply with federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 207.

Steering column separation

NHTSA investigation DP03002 · opened May 7, 2003 · closed Jul 22, 2003

Mr. Larry a. Sackey submitted a petition to the national highway traffic safety administration (NHTSA) by letter dated April 18, 2003, requesting that nhtsafurther investigate the defective collapsible steering shaft system on 1987-1995 vehicles manufactured by the daimlerchrysler corporation.in part because of 49 cfr ? 30120(g), NHTSA has decided to limit the scope of the petition vehicles to 1993-1995 models,…

What 1995 Dodge Ram 2500 owners say

Brakes all 61 →

I was leaving the parking lot to the stop sign and I applied the brakes and my vehicle continued rolling even when I applied more pressure until it stopped in the middle of the intersection. I was not hit but close. I pulled over to the side of the street and brakes seem to be working again. I took it straight to a wheel and brake shop very close to where this happen and they check the system and told me what had cause this problem was the vacuum hose from the vacuum pump to the brake booster was collapsing so I had them replace it. I went to your web site and found a recall #NHTSA 97V068000 for this problem so I called daimlerchrysler and they told me that this recall did not include my vehicle and they would not take care of this problem. I don't understand why it should not cover all the vehicle's with this problem.

Power assist › Vacuum › Hoses, lines/piping, and fittings · 123,000 miles · Jul 2005

I have a long history of reporting serious major safety component problems and failures to Chrysler on both of my vehicles. My vehicles have been in three accidents resulting from failed safety components. Each time after the accident, the dealer was able to find the problem and correct it. However, this has never happened before the accident. In the case of the brake line failure it involves every 1195 br2500 hd pickup truck. Chrysler found and corrected the problem at some point because the replacement part is designed to reduce the bends which cause the line to rub against the wheel rim on turns. I have experienced thousands of dollars in damages that were caused by Chrysler. How do I get my money back?

Foundation components › Hoses, lines/piping, and fittings · Feb 1999 · crash

Transmission & drivetrain all 39 →

I have a long history of reporting serious major safety component problems and failures to Chrysler on both of my vehicles. My vehicles have been in three accidents resulting from failed safety components. Each time after the accident, the dealer was able to find the problem and correct it. However, this has never happened before the accident. In the case of the brake line failure it involves every 1195 br2500 hd pickup truck. Chrysler found and corrected the problem at some point because the replacement part is designed to reduce the bends which cause the line to rub against the wheel rim on turns. I have experienced thousands of dollars in damages that were caused by Chrysler. How do I get my money back?

Driveline · Feb 1999 · crash

After driving 5 or 10 minutes vehicle lost power and stalled. Consumer contacted the manufacturer, and had taken it to dealer on several occasions. But problem recurred. Vehicle was under warranty. However, the warranty did not cover the problems of the vehicle, and consumer had to pay out of pocket. The consumer had little control of the vehicle's steering while driving. Antifreeze leaked from the vehicle. The engine flooded and stall. The vehicle ran rough prior to reaching 75 MPH. Occasionally the serpentine belt ran crooked on the pulley and broke. The exhaust system leaked. The fuel tank was not properly fitted to the holders. The transmission leaked fluid.

Automatic transmission · 0 miles · Jun 2004

Speed control & acceleration all 34 →

Attn frank borris. Upon pushing throttle to wot the cable stuck. I noticed the pedal wouldn't return at about 35 MPH. I reached 80-90mph before hitting the brakes. At 40 MPH I put the engine in neutral and turned the ignition off. I lost steering and my power brakes and went into a ditch. I suffered no injuries and my truck suffered no serious damage. I managed to free the cable and return to home with caution and low throttle. I replaced the cable (which Dodge had in stock). When I took the old one out I noticed the cable frayed inside the sheath. I had noticed prior to this incident (thanks to the other members of the tdr) the cable started to fray near the ball cup at the end. I cut off a broken strand at the ball cup. I couldn't notice the broken strands in the sheath at that time. I'm sending the cable (via frank borris) for your further investigation.

Accelerator pedal · Dec 2000 · crash

I have a long history of reporting serious major safety component problems and failures to Chrysler on both of my vehicles. My vehicles have been in three accidents resulting from failed safety components. Each time after the accident, the dealer was able to find the problem and correct it. However, this has never happened before the accident. In the case of the brake line failure it involves every 1195 br2500 hd pickup truck. Chrysler found and corrected the problem at some point because the replacement part is designed to reduce the bends which cause the line to rub against the wheel rim on turns. I have experienced thousands of dollars in damages that were caused by Chrysler. How do I get my money back?

Feb 1999 · crash

1995 Dodge Ram 2500 engines & fuel economy

EngineTransmissionDriveMPG city / hwy / combined
5.2L 8-cyl4-speed automaticRWD12 / 16 / 13
5.2L 8-cyl5-speed manualRWD11 / 15 / 13
5.9L 8-cyl5-speed manualRWD11 / 15 / 13
5.2L 8-cyl5-speed manual4WD/AWD11 / 14 / 13
5.9L 8-cyl4-speed automaticRWD11 / 15 / 12
5.2L 8-cyl4-speed automatic4WD/AWD11 / 15 / 12
5.9L 8-cyl4-speed automatic4WD/AWD10 / 14 / 12
5.9L 8-cyl5-speed manual4WD/AWD11 / 14 / 12

EPA ratings. Class: Full-size pickup.

Frequently asked questions

Is the 1995 Dodge Ram 2500 a good car?

Based on 267 owner complaints filed with NHTSA, the 1995 Ram 2500 rates average: about as many complaints as a typical year of the Ram 2500 at the same age. Complaint counts don't account for sales volume or individual maintenance, so have any used car inspected before buying.

What is the most common problem with the 1995 Dodge Ram 2500?

The brakes — 61 complaints, 23% of all complaints for this model year, most often about antilock/traction control/electronic limited slip. Next are the transmission & drivetrain (39) and speed control & acceleration (34).

How many recalls does the 1995 Dodge Ram 2500 have?

NHTSA lists no recalls for the 1995 Dodge Ram 2500. You can still confirm with your VIN using our VIN recall check.

What are the best and worst years of the Dodge Ram 2500?

The best years by complaints, compared at the same age, are 2002, 2000 and 1998. Years to avoid or approach with caution: 2006, 2003 and 2004. See the full Dodge Ram 2500 years comparison.

At what mileage do 1995 Dodge Ram 2500 problems happen?

The median mileage reported in complaints is about 125,000 miles; 13% of problems with a recorded mileage started before 50,000 miles.

Source: U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) — owner complaints through October 20, 2026, recalls and defect investigations; fuel economy from the EPA. Complaints are unverified reports and are not proof of a defect. How we rate model years.