2000 Chevrolet S10 Problems & Complaints

Use caution1.5× as many complaints as a typical year of the S10 at the same age

Owners have filed 471 complaints about the 2000 Chevrolet S10 with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. That is 1.5× as many as a typical S10 model year at the same age — above average, so look closely at the problem areas below before you buy. The most reported problem area is the brakes (105 complaints, typically around 70,000 miles). 4 recalls cover this model year.

471complaints
4recalls
52crashes
8fires
46injuries
3deaths

Most common 2000 Chevrolet S10 problems

  • Brakes~70,000 miles
    10522%
  • Body & structure~68,000 miles
    9320%
  • Seats~40,000 miles
    5512%
  • 4610%
  • Engine & cooling~45,000 miles
    337%
  • 296%
  • Air bags~107,000 miles
    296%
  • Electrical system~72,000 miles
    266%
  • Suspension~34,000 miles
    194%
  • Speed control & acceleration~62,000 miles
    174%
  • Lights~111,000 miles
    163%
  • Locks & latches~65,000 miles
    143%
  • Steering~46,000 miles
    123%
  • Wheels & tires~99,000 miles
    92%
  • Seat belts~109,000 miles
    82%
  • Equipment & accessories
    82%
  • Other / not specified~50,000 miles
    82%
  • Windows, wipers & sunroof
    71%
  • A/C & heater
    31%

Share of the 471 complaints; one complaint can involve more than one system. "~" is the median mileage when the problem started.

Chevrolet S10 complaints by model year

199519961997199819992000200120022003200491767046961323147130821417821
Owner complaints per model year, Chevrolet S10. Colour = our verdict for that year (red: avoid, orange: caution, green: better than average, blue: too new).

Best S10 years: 2004, 2003, 2002. Years to avoid: 1995, 1996, 1998, 1997, 2000. Compare all years →

2000 Chevrolet S10 recalls (4)

Equipment › Other › Labels

NHTSA recall 00V258001 · Sep 8, 2000 · 223,194 vehicles

Vehicle description: light duty pickup trucks and sport utility vehicles. Some of these vehicles were built with incorrect payload information on the vehicle certification label. The payload shown on the label is greater than the maximum validated payload.

Remedy: Owners will be sent a new label for installation on the driver's door of the vehicle.

Seat belts

NHTSA recall 00V228003 · Aug 7, 2000 · 156,305 vehicles

Vehicle description: passenger vehicles, light duty trucks, sport utility vehicles, and Mini vans equipped with trw seat belt buckle assemblies. The buckle base of these seat belt assemblies were not properly heat treated and therefore do not pass the load bearing requirement of federal motor vehicle safety standard no.

Remedy: Dealers will inspect the vehicle's safety belt buckle assembly date codes and, if necessary, will replace any safety belt buckle assembly.

Service brakes, hydraulic › Antilock/traction control/electronic limited slip

NHTSA recall 00V-055 · Feb 28, 2000 · 10,674 vehicles

Vehicle description: light duty pickup trucks equipped with 4-wheel disc brakes. Some of these vehicles have an antilock brake system (ABS) motor containing an out-of-specification spring clip. This clip could allow the motor bearing to become misaligned. If misalignment occurs, eventually the ABS would be non-functional.

Remedy: Dealers will replace the brake pressure module valve assembly.

Service brakes, hydraulic › Antilock/traction control/electronic limited slip

NHTSA recall 99V-220 · Aug 11, 1999 · 3,947 vehicles

Vehicle description: s -trucks equipped with 2 wheel drive. These vehicles May have had the right-hand antilock brake system (ABS) module feed pipe and/or brake crossover pipe tube nuts tightened without seating the pipe-flared-ends enough to withstand normal assembly and vehicle inputs without partially unseating.

Remedy: Dealers will inspect the brake pipe union for signs of brake fluid, and if necessary, install a new brake pipe union.

NHTSA defect investigations

Federal safety investigators have looked into 3 possible defects involving the 2000 Chevrolet S10:

Tailgate support cable(s) break

NHTSA investigation RQ04012 · opened Nov 22, 2004 · closed Apr 14, 2005

Odi is upgrading rq04-012 and opening an ea to investigate the tailgate support cables installed in 1998 - 2004 model year sonoma and s10 model vehicles.general motors is conducting recall campaign 04v-129 to replace the tailgate support cables originally installed in certain model year 2000-2004 sierras and silverados and certain model year 2002-2004 avalanches and escalade exts (c/k models).general motors has…

Engine stall due to fuel starvation

NHTSA investigation PE02066 · opened Sep 6, 2002 · closed Nov 3, 2003

Odi opened pe02-066 to evaluate the scope and consequence of engine power-loss due to fuel starvation induced by in-tank modular fuel pump strainer restriction.the subject pumps use an external ?sock? Strainer to filter fuel flowing to the pump inlet.this filter can sometimes become clogged, resulting in a reduced flow of fuel to the engine.GM has subsequently modified the strainers to reduce this…

Tailgate support cables

NHTSA investigation EA05008 · opened Apr 14, 2005 · closed May 19, 2006

General motors is conducting a special policy program for 903,464 owners of 2000 - 2003 model s/t vehicles through which owners May, at their option, either (1) periodically inspect the tailgate support cables installed in their vehicle and have the cables replaced if the cable coating exhibits any indications of damage or deterioration or (2) request that the tailgate support cables be replaced free of charge.

What 2000 Chevrolet S10 owners say

Brakes all 105 →

My dad purchased my truck from the church secretary where he attended in March of 2015. At the time of purchase it only had 66,000 miles on it. The secretary's father owned it and used it from new until 6 months before we purchased it and only used it to help feed his cows. 1. Window washer motor circuit 2. Seatbelt need's stitched 3. The overload sticker is wrong Came in after we purchased the truck but my dad was sick and he passed away 3/8/2016 Coated brake rotor & hub assembly (86757CR)x2 Tie rod end (NCD 2693017)x2 Ball joint front lower (NCD 2601130)x2 Tie rod end control arm front left (NCD 2605330) Tie rod end control arm and ball joint front right upper (NCP 2605329) Tie rod adjusting sleeve front (NCD 2691109)x2 Idler arm assembly (NCD 2683654) Tie rod End outer (NCD 2683267)x2 Steering center link (NCD 2721591) TOO MUCH NOISE AND WHEN MAKING A PARKING LOT TURN IT FELT AND …

Oct 2016

Tl* the contact owns a 2000 Chevrolet S10. While driving 26 MPH around an s curve, the brakes pedal was applied, but seized. The contact lost control of the vehicle and crashed into an embankment and creek. The air bags did not deploy. The driver was not wearing a seat belt and sustained neck, nose, and eye injuries that required medical attention. A police report was filed. The vehicle was towed to the contact's residence. The manufacturer and dealer were not contacted. The cause of the failures was not determined. The failure mileage was 230,000.

230,000 miles · Oct 2019 · crash · 1 injury

Body & structure all 93 →

The bedliner was installed at the car dealer ship at time of purchase. At that time we were told that you can fill gas containers in the back of the truck because there was a problem with static electricity igniting the gas. There is also a sticker on the bedliner warnining of this problem. There also seem to be another problem problem. After stopping to gat gas at a station on I-95 outside of washington and with no flamible materials in the truck the bed liner ignited in flames about 1 mile down the highway. I belive that because it is an over the rim bed liner and the fill spot for gas is just 8" away from the edge of the liner gas fumes during the filling process get traped under the liner and can be ignighted by static. Because of the type of liner there is a gap between the truck boby of about a 1/4" all the way around the truck. …

Frame and members · May 2000 · fire

While standing on the tailgate of my s-10 pickup, the left supporting cable broke. The cable on the other side held so there was no injury or damage. My inspection of the breakage revealed the multistranded steel cable had become heavily rusted and thereby weakened. The cable is covered by plastic tubing which can be easily abraded by repeated opening and closing of the tailgate. Moreover the cable is obviously made from unprotected metal ie. Zinc-dichromate at best, rather than ganvanized or stainless. (zinc-dichromate sacrifices itself to moisture over a short period of time). I went the area dealer who, after checking to see it was on the recall list, quoted over $100.00 to replace both the left and right cables. I learned some larger truck models already had recalls for this problem. …

Body › Door › Hinge and attachments · 26,000 miles · Oct 2004

Seats all 55 →

The driver's seat has not been working properly for several months. The seat will not stay locked in place and this has created a dangerous situation, especially in intersections, when the truck has been in motion. Now that this has happened several times, I've been especially careful & prepared to move the seat back forward so I can again reach the pedals. My solution for the time being - placing a wooden 2x4 piece behind the seat so it will stay fixed. It's working, but it is very inconvenient getting into or out of the seat. Will try to repair or take to a shop if a recall is not mandated.

108,000 miles · Mar 2018

When attempting to back the truck up, the backs of the seats are too high and it obstructs my view. One night while trying to back my truck up in my yard, my view was too obstructed and I hit a tree. The tailgate of my truck was down, and was damaged. It is un-repairable. I was backing up at about 5 MPH, so the airbags didn't open. This has been a problem from the beginning. I haven't contacted the manufacturer, but if you advise me to do so, I will. The anti-lock brakes just went made a grinding noise and I had to almost push them to the floor to stop...I was going 35-40 MPH and someone in front of me slammed on their brakes. Since then, the brakes scrub and make a grinding noise if I don't stop gradually. The brake pads were looked at and are okay. I'm not a mechanic, but if it's not the pads, then what is it??? …

Front assembly › Recliner · Apr 2001 · crash

2000 Chevrolet S10 engines & fuel economy

EngineTransmissionDriveMPG city / hwy / combined
2.2L 4-cyl5-speed manualRWD20 / 26 / 23
2.2L 4-cyl4-speed automaticRWD17 / 24 / 19
4.3L 6-cyl5-speed manualRWD16 / 21 / 18
4.3L 6-cyl4-speed automaticRWD15 / 20 / 17
4.3L 6-cyl5-speed manual4WD/AWD15 / 20 / 17
4.3L 6-cyl4-speed automatic4WD/AWD14 / 19 / 16

EPA ratings. Class: Small pickup.

Frequently asked questions

Is the 2000 Chevrolet S10 a good car?

Based on 471 owner complaints filed with NHTSA, the 2000 S10 rates use caution: 1.5× as many complaints as a typical year of the S10 at the same age. It is one of the S10 years we suggest avoiding. Complaint counts don't account for sales volume or individual maintenance, so have any used car inspected before buying.

What is the most common problem with the 2000 Chevrolet S10?

The brakes — 105 complaints, 22% of all complaints for this model year, most often about antilock/traction control/electronic limited slip. Next are the body & structure (93) and seats (55).

How many recalls does the 2000 Chevrolet S10 have?

There are 4 recalls for the 2000 Chevrolet S10, the most recent from September 8, 2000 (labels). Recall repairs are free at any authorized dealer — check whether yours has been done with the VIN recall check.

What are the best and worst years of the Chevrolet S10?

The best years by complaints, compared at the same age, are 2004, 2003 and 2002. Years to avoid or approach with caution: 1995, 1996, 1998, 1997 and 2000. See the full Chevrolet S10 years comparison.

At what mileage do 2000 Chevrolet S10 problems happen?

The median mileage reported in complaints is about 60,000 miles; 37% of problems with a recorded mileage started before 50,000 miles.

Source: U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) — owner complaints through October 20, 2026, recalls and defect investigations; fuel economy from the EPA. Complaints are unverified reports and are not proof of a defect. How we rate model years.